One of the co -creators of Superman is Warner Bros. Warner Bros., part of the new movie “Superman”, part of the planned restart of the DC comic superhero movie franchise. A copyright lawsuit was filed in the US Court for Discovery. (Read: James Gun shares the invisible video of Superman on the David Colence Wet in a new teaser, the Internet is not impressed.
Superman litigation
The lawsuit was raised on Friday by the property of the Superman illustrator Joseph Chastar in the Federal Court in New York City.
The lawsuit noted that Shastar and Siegel have approved the right to the character of the detective comic, the predecessor of the DC comic, the current Warner subsidiary. Under the British law, the lawsuit claims that the right of the chastar has returned to his property 25 years after his death, in 2017.
The real estate accused Warner illegally failed to pay royalties to use Superman in Britain, Canada, Australia, and outside the United States.
All about new superman movies
A new superman movie will be released in the theater in July, directed by James Gun and starring David Colence Wet. New lawsuits can complicate the international distribution of movies. It marks the latest Salvo in a long -term legal battle over character rights.
SHUSTER’S ESTATE is looking for a court order to block financial damages and Warner’s description of Superman without a license.
“We will fundamentally oppose the benefits of the lawsuit and violently defend our rights,” said Warner’s spokeswoman.
“This lawsuit does not intend to take the next Superman from fans, but is looking for compensation for the basic contribution of Joe Saster as a co -creator of Superman,” is in real estate. Lawyer Mark Tovelov stated in a statement.
According to a lawsuit, Shastar and Siegel began creating a Superman comic strip in 1934. Detective comics, the predecessor of DC, began to publish comics in 1938.
SHUSTER, SIEGEL and their land have been involved in lawsuits with Warner over the rights of Superman for decades. The 9th Police Court, based in San Francisco, determined in 2013 that creators could not regain their rights based on US laws.
However, new litigation quotes British law. Real estate has argued that the distribution of works featuring Superman after 2017, including movies, television programs, and video games, has infringed the copyright in countries that comply with British laws.
