Johannesburg, South Africa -This week, President Donald Trump threatened to reduce all funds to South Africa, claiming that Pretoria’s authorities were seizing illegal land.
Trump’s claim is based on the myth that the South African government has been violently denied and that white South Africans are targeted for illegal land confiscation.
“South Africa has confiscated land and handles people in a specific class very terribly,” Trump wrote on a true social post on Sunday. “The United States does not support it. We will act, and until the complete survey of this situation is completed, I will block all funds to South Africa!”
In response, South Africa’s President Syrill Lamafosa quickly denied the government’s approved land and said, “South African government has not confiscated land.”
Last month, South Africa adopted the expenditure method. This regains land of public interests in order to deal with land that has become a public interest, to deal with the disparities of ownership caused by the control of a racial aparthle for several decades. I adopted help.
Ramafosa explained that it would defend the law and not function as a “confiscation means”, but to promote public access to land.
“South Africa always had a collection of expenditures to balance the need for public use of land and protect the rights of property owners, like the United States and other countries,” said Ramafosa. Next, I explained in detail in the statement.
South Africa is a constitutional democracy that is dominated by law, justice, and equal and deeply rooted. The South African government has not confiscated land.
The recently adopted exposement method is not a confiscation means, but a legal obligatory mandatory …
-February 3, 2025, Cyril Ramaphosa (@cyrilramaphosa)
In the discussion, Eron Musk, a millionaire born in South Africa and Trump’s closer advisor, has become heavier, accusing the Ramafosa government to be “public and racial ownership law”, and mineral resources in South Africa. The Minister has stated that if Trump reduced funds, South Africa should consider the source of mineral exports. US.
So, is the one behind South Africa’s land policy actually targeted in Japan? What should I know this:
What is land expenditure and why is it happening?
The expenditure method was signed by Ramafosa in January. It will make it easier for the state to expure several lands to address racial gaps in ownership after the 1994 apartheite.
The South African government has stated that the law does not allow the property to expand the property, and that the landowner must reach the agreement.
The government has argued that the law enables “legal procedures obliged in the Constitution” and enables expritates without compensation in situations that are regarded as “fair, fair and public interests.”
Commenting on the implementation of the exposement law of Tembeka NGCUKAITOBI in South African lawyers and South African lawyers, it was a legal process designed to streamline government access to land for public interests.
“The hysteria on the exposement law is a mischievous thing,” he emphasized that the law did not allow land as claimed.
NGCUKAITOBI explains that the law allows the “NIL compensation” of land, which is deemed necessary for public goods that may include unused property and property that can bring risks to the general public.
“Most of the mischief is a misaligned display, and as if it had not been expressed (although), what ANC wants to do is the grab of Zimbab Estyle, which is not clear,” he said. National Council.
Is the government unreasonably targeting white South Africans?
Trump’s comment on Sunday, “South Africa was handling people in a particular class very terrible,” was given without providing evidence. His words reminiscent of his first administration when an unprecedented claim of “large -scale killing” of South African white farmers was being performed. At that time, Pretoria said that Trump was misunderstood.
Africans, a right -wing lobby group that represents the interests of white South Africans in Africans, has been a lobby activity in Trump and the United States Congress, and has been threatened by the property right after the consequences of the Collection Law. I am claiming.
For many years, the group has permanently sought right -handed support in the United States, faced the unfair races that could lead to the confiscation of property land owners. So we promoted the story that there is a politically motivated campaign.
It has also been supplied to the myths that appear in South Africa in South Africa in social media, which has been held in South Africa.
Researchers and scholars reveal the claim that farm attacks and robbery are politically motivated, and instead they are one of the most dangerous countries in the world in South Africa. I claim that it is part of.
“South Africa is clearly a problem with violence crime,” said criminal scholars Rudolph Jin, saying that violence was not limited to white -owned farms.
In light of this week’s Trump statement, AFRIFORUM has announced plans to conduct a lobby activity to the US government to sanction Anc politicians, and that South African residents do not need to bear the results of Trump’s remarks. did. However, many people argue that the spread of Africa Fallom’s incorrect information on this problem is partially responsible for framing the story of Trump.
What is the history of confiscation of land in South Africa?
The confiscation of the people from the land, especially the blacks and indigenous people, was a central feature of South Africa’s history, deeply intertwined with the brutal aparthite administration and the colonialism of the previous year.
The extremely important law, which is an indigenous land law in 1913, restricted the purchase or renting land in “White South Africa” designated by the black South Africans, resulting in the population of the indigenous people. 。
According to FREEDOM CHARTER, the land, which is a foundation of the foundation stone between the anti -apartheite struggle and the current constitutional foundation, should “belong to everyone living there.” However, 30 years after the end of the apartheid, land inequality remains severe, and the majority of black population is still worst.
Since the emergence of democracy in 1994, the South African government has been working on land ownership issues, and discussions on land reform are becoming increasingly related to political discourses.
According to the latest census, white South Africans are slightly higher than 7 % of the population. However, according to government data in 2017, they own more than 70 % of domestic private farmland.
According to experts, the continuous disparity of land ownership, which is mostly distorted in support of minority, has led to the need for reform and exposition.
This long -standing context reflects a continuous struggle that demands more fair land distribution among various South African people, making the story presented by Trump and his supporters.
Why is South Africa land policy a problem for Trump now?
Political analyst ONGAMA MTIMKA stated that Trump’s comments could have been motivated by incorrect information, but were also part of a wider and forced foreign policy agenda.
“Trump doesn’t have a lot of knowledge, but he knows what it means, but he operates his emotions to arrange ANC on the selection of foreign policy. It’s Trump forced. He is part of a foreign policy strategy, “he said.
Trump’s threat to reducing assistance to South Africa was due to discipline sanctions on countries such as Canada and Mexico and stopped funding to the US International Development Organization (USAID) for the next three months.
Mucinka said that Gaza’s Geno Side’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) may have motivated Trump’s attitude to censorship of Israel. “It’s definitely related,” he said.
This is not the first time that Trump has raised a problem of attacking white South Africans. When he was the president in 2018, he instructed on Twitter, and he instructed him to investigate his secretary, Mike Pompeo, to find out “land and farm attacks” and “large -scale murder of farmers” in South Africa. I said.
Muchinka said he would not be surprised, even if he was influenced by his close adviser, who has long been criticized for the South African government’s transformational policy.
In 2023, the mask accused the Ramafosa government that the Genocide had allowed the white farmers to occur.
Following Trump’s new comments, the mask reply to the question on Monday to the issue of Ramafosa’s official account on X, “Why is there a racist ownership law?” It was added to.
Since then, Ramafosa’s office has announced that the pair has had a conversation on South Africa “about wrong information and distortion issues.”
“In the process, the president has repeatedly embedded the value of South Africa’s constitution, the rule of law, justice, fairness, and respect,” said South Africa.
What does Trump’s statement mean to South Africa and US relations?
The South African government is eager to be involved in diplomacy with the United States over the national land reform policy, and states that the government has committed a constitutional democracy.
Ramafosa further focused on being involved in Trump.
“I am convinced that these engagement will share a better understanding of these issues,” he said.
Ramafosa took the measured approach to Trump’s threat, but the reaction of the Minister of Mineral and Resources in South Africa was more pointed out.
Lecture at the Mining Conference on Monday, he suggested that if South Africa was cut off for funding, it should be objectively collected to export mineral to the United States. This is important because South Africa exports various minerals, such as platinum, iron, and manganese to the United States.
According to Reuters reports, South Africa received about $ 440 million aid from the United States in 2023. However, South Africa has neglected the results of bidding to reduce Trump’s assistance, stating that the United States has not provided other important funds other than US President’s emergency plan. Ramaphosa said Aids Relief (Pepfar) that it was only 17 % of the South African program to fight HIV/AIDS.
Muchinka stated that South Africa should not accept rude, but is the second largest export partner in South Africa, so it is incredible that it will not need the United States. “The stupid radicalism doesn’t intend to do us much,” he said.
South Africa has benefited from Africa’s growth and opportunity (AGOA). This enables tax exemption access to the US market for considerable parts of South Africa products. AGOA has been set to expire in September 2025.
On Monday, Trump’s threat triggered all South Africa land, shares and government bonds in a hurry.
