Last week, Hamas senior officials have expressed their mutual motivation in the “dialogue” in the media. Hamas’s senior leaders, Musa Abu Maltook, and the US President Middle East, Steve Witkov, probably share the frenzy of Israel that has caused the current war in the current region. It is most likely that you intend to test water for a typical movement. Iran is a bad news for everyone involved.
US President Donald Trump has repeatedly shown his intentions to end the war in the Middle East and Ukraine. Hamas dominated Gaza during the ceasefire, and had the opportunity to demonstrate that it was an important political group among Palestinians during the ceasefire.
In relation to this, the sudden trends of the United States and Hamas in “dialogue” should be taken seriously, and it should be carefully explored for the maximum benefits for the Middle East and later. is.
Certainly there is a large bay between the two actors. Washington is deeply conspicling the devastation of Israel’s massacre in Gaza, but Hamas’s resistance movements are widely seen as a terrorist organization from the West. But this is exactly why they must meet, speak, and identify the potential to transition from each other’s position, militarism to peace construction. Since the ongoing ceasefire is an opportunity to start this process, completing the three phases should be the top priority.
Effective Israel’s propaganda has long become a demon on the west of Hamas as a reckless and malicious terrogue loop that wants to destroy Israel. However, in reality, Hamas has succeeded in a Palestinian national political organization because it combines three important dynamics supported by most 14 million Palestinians around the world. Political activity to build a national political program supported by all Palestinian sect. And a plagmatism that always explores how to solve the conflict with Zionism peacefully.
Understanding Hamas and its position does not mean that you officially recognize it, adopt its view, or criticize extremists. This usually reflects the global definitions of the tolerable armed resistance for occupation, and sometimes meet the definition of terrorism to civilians.
As with most liberation movements, Hamas also practices militarism, resistance, terrorism, and political plagmatism. Recognizing and separating these chains is the key to the way to a peaceful solution of a dispute with Israel. In other words, when the Israeli government appears, it really wants permanent peace.
Hama dialogue in the United States can clarify whether both of them are looking for peace. My life interaction with the leaders of Palestine is the most important but not evaluated attributes in Hamas and Palestine Liberation Organizations, but in 1967 borders adjusted by mutual consent. It indicates that they have been a long -standing motivation to establish a coexisting Palestinian nation.
Hamas has expressed official, unofficial, and repeated this view. Since 2002, it has been unanimously formulated with Pan Love Peace offer to Israel. These positions were reconfirmed last week in an interview with Hamas’s official bass mem nime.
The Israeli hardline leaders have never made a peaceful resolution, as Hamas and all other Palestine groups have consistently ignored these offers.
Studies have shown in research that Corto Louder, a Canadian scholar, has been a major disability since the 1970s and the rebellion between the United States and Israel to implement international law -based consensus to resolve the two states of conflicts. I am. As he wrote in 2023, “In January 1976, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) has negotiated the consensus of the” two states “. With the support of Washington, Israel has refused to refuse the bad religion of Israeli Americans (…). In fact, it is the main “disability against peace”. “
Along with the relentless Israeli invasion, this rejection has been a shionist that has been driven out as many Palestinians as possible from its ancestors since 1920 and formulates the exclusive Jewish sovereign for all of the historical Palestinian.・ Reflects Israel’s purpose.
The terms accepting Hamas have remained on the table because the dispute deteriorated from the Arab side and expanded throughout the region. They are hard, but realistic. They require that Zionism defines borders and ends the rampage of colonies in the region, and Palestinians have demanded the official nation at only 22 % of the historical Palestine.
All agreements to support peace and drop the war are strict, demanding strict changes in policies in all aspects. The end of the U.S. War in the South Africa’s Apartheite administration and Vietnam and Afghanistan is not only an example of how severe compromise on peace is, but how important they are.
If Witkoff and Abu Marzouk are talking for each government, as I doubt, this is when we will move on to the US Hama dialogue and, especially the Hauler that does not stop in the United States and Israel. This important step from the event.
Above all, above all, you must avoid errors in Oslocrocess in 1993 and other peaceful attempts. This was replaced with infinite conversation sessions on concessions on both sides, but the expansion and annexation of Israel were explicitly supported.
Using this opportunity, in response to the expansion of war and suffering, we must work overtime to shift the whole Middle East for the future coexistence of all states from the tragic current road of militarism. It will not be blurred.
The views expressed in this article are the author himself, not necessarily reflecting Al Jazira’s editing stance.
