The property of Superman’s creator Joseph Suster complains of Warner Bros. Discovery and his DC comics, arguing that there is no right to release the future summer tent poles in a small number of important areas.
Plainthood Mark Warren Peary, a real estate executor, today in the Federal Court in the southern part of New York, “Canada, the UK, Ireland, Australia, and Declarative Defendants ‘Defendants’ Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant. He filed a lawsuit in search of “relief by”. Relief to establish ownership of chastar esthetics throughout the associated jurisdiction.
“The defendant is actively planning a major new superman motion picture and other derivative works for an imminent global release,” said this issue. Ta.
The latest Superman, featuring David Colence Wet, will be released on July 11. The cast includes Royce Lane, Rois Lane, Nicholas Holt, Lex Luther, and Maria Gabriela de Farria as an engineer.
Warner, Peary and his long -standing legal teams had previously been in court, but recently they were related to the right to dismiss the US Copyright Act. However, in this case, the problem of automatic foreign copyright recovery did not occur until a few years later, said Mark Torov, a real estate lawyer, but did not actually file a lawsuit.
That’s right now.
“We will fundamentally oppose the benefits of the lawsuit and violently defend our rights,” said WBD Spokesman.
The problem includes the original superman character and the foreign copyright of the story co -authored by Jerome Sigel and Shastar. Siegel and Shastar assigned the DC’s predecessor to the predecessor of DC to “only $ 130 ($ 65)), but British legal, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia. The proposal law in the tradition is automatically terminated automatically, 25 years after the author’s death, the profit of such a country that has not been divided. I will give it to the chastar Estate. “
“Saigel died in 1992 and Siegel died in 1996. The operation of the law has automatically in 2017 in 2017, in 2017, most of these territories (and 2021). Returning, the defendant exploited Superman throughout these jurisdictions, without approval of films, television series, or products, in violation of the copyright law of these countries. I am continuing.
This is the most welcomed because DC and parent’s WBD starts preparing for the release. In DC Studios, DC Studios’s joint head James Gunn was the most popular in both the THE TRAiler in both DC and Warner Bros. Please see below.
The lawsuit claims that “the defendant’s direct infringement is ignored, ignores the plaintiff’s right, indifferent, indifferent, intentional, intentional, intentional, and intentional.” The JU trial is demanding.
“As a result of the defendant infringing the copyright and exclusive rights of the work, including the actual damage of the plaintiff and the defendant’s interests, the plaintiff was injured in the amount determined in the trial.” Ta.
On the other hand, real estate asks the court to stop and abolish -“Defendant, executives, agents, employees, and people who work in cooperation with them, in advance in this lawsuit, and then permanently. We are calling for infringement: (a) Do you contribute or contribute to infringement of infringement by others, to work or coordinate, or infringe others? Or, or (b), a copy of the plaintiff’s joint work, a copy of the plaintiff, without the plaintiff’s consent or (b) a plaintiff. Sales, license, exhibition, distribution, or use or abuse of other methods.
