Eron Musk’s recent interest in the EU and British politics seem a little mysterious. But, as Damian Tumbini claims, behind it is the same reason that the mask has led to Donald Trump. It is not an ideological affinity of a deep sheet, but an explicit economic interest.
Why is British, Germany, and Europe politics on the earth very important for the world’s most wealthy people? Eron may be consumed by the worries of the immigration, the “intention” and “Western civilization”. However, it is a personal financial interest to explain why MUSK decides to weaken the EU and to make Germany unstable to weaken the British government.
With a familiar movement to some newspapers, Elon Musk purchased a loss communication enterprise (Twitter) and turned it into propaganda tools. He continued to exchange the power of the propaganda of this new megaphone with political entrepreneurs, especially in the presidential election in exchange for other investments. These investments in the universe, low orbital satellites, and AI depend on state sponsorship and regulations, requiring proximity to political power, which is promoted by the power of propaganda.
In light of the vicious cycle, it is clear why Eron Musk needs to confuse the EU. If the Foundation X is damaged, the entire card’s house may collapse. This is the threat of the new paradigm of the EU and British regulations. Masks do as much as possible to impair the EU regulations. This is a highly possible sign that is effective. Last Friday, the European Commission issued a retention order and asked X to hold and share the recommended system and recent internal documents related to recent changes. The committee uses authority based on the Digital Service Law so that social media does not create systematic risks in Europe, including democracy. Establishing a leader in Europe, which matches him and Trump’s worldview is fundamental to his business.
Establishing a leader in Europe, which matches him and Trump’s worldview is fundamental to his business.
This is not just to confuse social media regulations. The mask has a valuable first morver advantage in his satellite business, but if he locks his advantages and cannot deal with his competitors, he is more and more competitive. You will notice that. Establishing a leader in Europe, which matches him and Trump’s worldview is fundamental to his business.
How to threaten X of the mask
It is more reasonable to examine the current status of the EU and British regulations, the unstable political interference of US entrepreneurs, and his “heroic” freedom. The mask is participating in a full campaign to impair the EU regulation. By impairing the EU’s political balance, and questioning the definition of freedom of speech.
The unpleasant fact is that MUSK refuses and cooperates with FactCheckers, which is participating in the campaign, must be platformed under the new EU administration. In 2023, the EU Congress passed the Digital Service Law into the law. Under the laws that are enforced this year, search and social media providers have many new duty to clean up platforms and reduce harm. The biggest platform in the whole EU needs to be able to provide detailed risk assessments in order to maintain an effective complaint system, for example, to cooperate with a third party such as a legendary fact checker. It is necessary to reduce not only “what is called systematic”. Risks including fake information. ”
Currently, Elon Musk’s communication platform is strongly resisting the regulations based on the Digital Service Law or the UK online Safety Law.
The UK has implemented a similar framework under the online safety law, like many other countries other than the EU. This is because a general approach to regulations is strongly influenced by British scholars, such as Wilpin and Ronnouts.
Currently, Elon Musk’s communication platform is strongly resisting the regulations based on the Digital Service Law or the UK online Safety Law. X is required by the European Union to submit risk assessments, and has publicly blamed the facts and the necessary content modeling frameworks under the law.
Mark Zuckerberg explained the requirements of the Digital Service Law as an EU tariff for US companies working in economic blocks. Of course, EU’s policy proprietors cannot separate the economic aspects of this regulation from geopolitical. It has been rejected since Edward Snowden revealed various backdoors in which the surveillance and capitalism of social media platforms was integrated with monitoring. BRICS, especially in Brazil and South Africa, the regulation of social media platforms was not only a matter of protecting citizens and children from harmful content, but also digital sovereignty.
One of the reasons why Volte’s face of Mark Suckerberg on social media regulations is very easy is that it leads to significant cost reductions.
How to refuse regulations can make a profit to masks and Zuckerberg
It is difficult to estimate the value of Elon Musk to reversing the digital service law and the UK online safety law. It is important to understand direct advantage not only for MUSK but also for indirect benefits. One of the reasons why recent Volte’s face of Mark Suckerberg on social media regulations was easy is to significantly reduce costs. There is also an expensive contract with a third party fact checker to provide a “independent” view on the truth of the post. This is like Mazda does not need to fit a seat belt or airbags on the car, and does not need to meet the smog safety standards. As in the case of X, safe liberalization quickly reduces the cost of Facebook. There is evidence that some users can leave the platform, but the switching cost is high, and the loose regulations can provide platform operators with adhesive and attractive dispersion in a more range. Content containing party propaga.
However, the indirect advantages of platform operators to delete the laws that need to be designed for safety are definitely more important for Elon Musk. The mask has built a communication platform on a powerful and almost completely opaque propaganda platform. To comply with the online safety law, the mask needs to slow this propaganda tool and open it according to public scrutiny and accountability. The pretend to be a freedom of speech was that he brought him to Trump -Eventually he was almost imprisoned for a fan -he was given access to political power. I did it.
Musk and Zuckerberg are promoting a version of free expressions that define censorship from the perspective of national behavior, for example, Musk, which is reported to be fine -tuned algorithm to increase the visibility of the mask itself. It is very tolerant of a private actor censorship by his own engineer. As I have shown in my recent book, this is an approach with a deep historical roots in the United States, but such a philosophy of freedom of speech is also contested. In addition, there is an approach to the freedom of speech in the EU, it is independent of the nation, and it allows various forms of speech regulations as long as the appropriate check and balance is subject to balance.
Legal challenges with the Digital Service Law are unlikely to succeed due to freedom of speech, and as my recent work has been exploring, more restrictive communication philosophy and media are deep history in all European countries. It has a constitutional roots. This is why the political settlement that has delivered it is restored in Eron Musk.
This article was first published in LSE British Politics and Policy Blog. Submit a LSE USAPP email newsletter and receive a summary of weekly articles. Special Image: For ANNA Moneymaker in ShutterStock, read the comment policy before commenting. Note: This article shows the author’s views, not the position of American politics and policies, London School of Economics. Shortening of this post: https: //wp.me/p3i2yf -etg
