Six reasons to select Intel or AMD in the next GPU instead of NVIDIA’s RTX 50 series

The desktop GPU market was not so exciting. We were all used to seeing NVIDIA to release the fastest card for each generation. Intel’s Arc Alchemist GPU provided the third option in 2022, but the company’s new Battremage GPU has become a real alternative to users.

On the other hand, AMD has renewed the Late Race Hardware, strengthens software chops with FSR 4, and is trying to focus only on midrange and budget segments. generation. AMD and Intel may be a better option for most gamers and productive users who always buy midrange and affordable cards.

6

The price will greatly improve the price

GPU of the masses

NVIDIA has a chalk hold with no discussion in the desktop GPU market. Its graphic card is known for spreading the boundaries of GPU technology and consistently producing the fastest cards of all generations. What NVIDIA doesn’t know is to give priority to the value of money or to provide a really exciting card in a budget segment. The latest RTX 50 series card is another on the luxurious GPU line.

Team green may make sense for those who have a deep pocket, but most users are shopping for midrange and budget GPUs that are currently targeting AMD and Intel. I am doing. The AMD’s future RX 9070 XT (yes, RX 8000 is skipped the naming law) series is widely rumored to break RTX 5070 at a price of less than $ 500. Obviously, you need to take these rumors in salt pinch, but AMD is given more value than before to have competitiveness in this generation.

Intel, on the other hand, has already confused the budget 1440p game segment by launching the ARC B580 for only $ 250, and manually broke the more expensive RTX 4060. The mid -range battle with AMD NVIDIA depends on the RDNA 4 fare for Blackwell on the third party benchmark. However, for valuable shoppers, AMD and Intel are clearly favorite because NVIDIA continues to move forward.

5

More VRAM for your money

Stop the calm of peanuts

NVIDIA’s skip in VRAM has become a folklore at this point. The company refused to accumulate high -end products with sufficient VRAM in 2025. The $ 999 RTX 5080 and $ 749 RTX 5070 have the last 16GB VRAM. RTX 4080 SUPER, RTX 4080, and RTX 4070 Ti Super. VRAM is still a point that NVIDIA’s customers still stick to because all architecture and software jump into Blackwell.

A sufficient VRAM is important for a consistent performance with higher resolution, and if it is important for you, you need to look at AMD and Intel. Surprisingly, Team Blue’s $ 250 ARC B580 has the same 12GB VRAM as NVIDIA’s $ 549 RTX 5070, and can run a budget card like the 1440P game. Even AMD offers many VRAMs in RX 6000, RX 7000, and preferably RX 9000 series GPUs.

NVIDIA may argue that Blackwell Architecture and Advanced Frame Generation technology may argue that VRAM uses a small amount, but it cannot be excluded by the company that VRAM artificially restricts low -level SKUs. Users who want the privilege of having sufficient VRAM will be forced to pay more for higher layers.

4

Because it is low power consumption, no new PSU is required

Why do you buy a GPU that is hungry for power when you need it?

There is a large force (and expensive power supply) with a great force. NVIDIA’s RTX GPU has consistently destroyed all generations of TDP records, and the RTX 50 series is not new. The flagship RTX 5090 has a 575W TDP because it contains RTX 5080 and RTX 5070 TI for 360W and 300W, respectively.

If you do not need RTX 5090 or RTX 5080 raw power, you can go to the Intel ARC B580 with 190W TDP or 150W inexpensive ARC B570. The budget gamer is probably not with 850W or 1000W power on the rig, and can be easily upgraded to an Intel new budget card.

On the other hand, AMD’s RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 are rumored that they have almost the same 260W as RTX 5070 250W, but both are cheaper than providing NVIDIA. AMD and Intel are now much better if the power is particularly high in your area, or if the GPU temperature is high and you don’t like the PSU upgrade time.

3

Productable users do not need to use bombs

It is not the only game that is good at AMD and Intel

Users who are interested in rendering, encoding, and other creative workloads can also benefit from this generation AMD and Intel graphics cards. Intel’s Alchemist GPU was already a decent productive GPU, but with unprecedented prices and high power consumption, attractive options have been reduced. Battlemage has greatly improved alchemists, with advanced hardware, more VRAMs, and lower prices.

On the other hand, AMD plans to bring a large profit to RDNA 3 with RDNA 4 architecture “built from zero” than RDNA 3. Productable users are looking forward to the AMD expansion media encoding and AI functions, thanks to the dedicated hardware that I have never seen before in RDNA 3 or RDNA 2.

Regardless of whether it is restricted by VRAM or a creative workload restricted by AI chops, instead of paying the premium of relatively expensive products of NVIDIA, AMD and Intel GPU are legally considered. can.

2

RDNA 4 is growing in late race and AI

Giant light traces and frame generations jump

AMD’s inferior late race is a main reason for consumers not to reward the company for many years. As long as the company has improved hardware and software, NVIDIA’s higher and more mature technology is far ahead. Even the AMD flagship GPU is very struggling with light tracing games compared to NVIDIA’s high -end GPU.

AMD is planning to announce the RDNA 4 GPU in March, so it may eventually be changed to 2025. For the first time, AMD has brought most of the complex calculations for tracing real -time ray traces to new dedicated RT core. Previously, AMD’s Ray Accelerators occupied the hardware component of the Ray Trace, but most of the calculations still occurred in its general -purpose core.

This is from the viewpoint of late race performance by pulling the RX 9000 series GPU ahead of RDNA 3. AMD has also announced that the next generation of FSR 4 has a great deal of AI and ML -based upscaling and frame generation, further approaching NVIDIA’s late race and upscaling function.

1

Intel ARC is no longer retrofitting

Team Blue doesn’t go anywhere

AMD is not only AMD that hardware and software jumped to this generation priority. Intel not only shows a large -scale jump in the performance of the late race compared to the best alchemist card (ARC A750 vs. ARC A770), but has also been significantly improved on things drivers. The driver was more mature and there was no problem with the ARC B580 test on the software side.

Intel will not slow down in the ARC section immediately and will launch even more powerful GPUs in the near future. The Intel ARC GPU has become a real option for a budget gamer who wants a really interesting but affordable GPU for existing or new game builds, as it has not been completely set a few years ago. However, things are not perfect because the battlemage GPU still has several major negative aspects.

In particular, when pairing with ARC B580 or ARC B570 with old or budgeted CPUs in more CPU bounce games, there is a large performance overhead. This is because the budget gamer knows that if the new CPU is not planned, the GPU performance may decrease compared to the RTX 4060 or RX 7600, which may decrease the performance of the GPU compared to the RTX 4060 or RX 7600. It should be something. The ARC GPU lacks appropriate VR support, so if it’s important for you, you need to look at other places.

It’s refreshing to see the real competition in the GPU space

Needless to say, competition is good for consumers. NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel rely on their strengths and forced others to provide more value to others, so consumers bring profits and the GPU industry goes forward as a whole. Intel is currently excellent in budgeted segments, except for some performance issues. AMD is convinced that the RX 9000 GPU will dominate the mid -range segment.

NVIDIA is still leading, regardless of whether to look at market share, mind share, and state -of -the -art performance, but more and more consumers are looking for affordable GPUs in both games and productivity. If Intel and AMD succeeded in creating a great dent in NVIDIA’s advantage, the market may reconsider the high GPU prices that have troubled consumers over multiple generations.