Demis Hassabis, a famous AI researcher and co -founder of Deepmind, has recently created a headline by receiving the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 2024. He continues to spread the ultimate goal, that is, to achieve all theories.
Currently, Deepmind, part of Google, has been fame in the development of AI programs. Beyond the game, Hassabi’s desire extends the complexity of the universe itself, exploring philosophical questions about the future of intelligence, consciousness, and technology.
In a conversation with Die Zeit, Hassabis defines intelligence, especially artificial general information (AGI), and “learn how to achieve tasks in itself, when it means artificial general information or AGI. It is a system that can be done …
Hassavis has shown optimism on the timeline to develop AGI, and his reputation will take more than 10 years to achieve 50 % of true AGIs within the next five years. You will be surprised. This prediction will tell you an unprecedented progress in various fields if it is recognized.
Regarding the question of whether the machine can develop a human consciousness, Hassavis shares his insight, “My guess is … you can have an intelligent system … but … but , They are not conscious. ” He pointed out moral and operational risks related to the creation of conscious AI systems, and emphasized the distinction between intelligence and consciousness as the center of AI development.
Hassavis has broken the misunderstanding over the recent break -through of the recent AI, especially in the claims of open innovation. He clearly denied the characteristics of these progress as an AGI -related test, saying, “It wasn’t the AGI test first. That’s … it’s a mistake.” This statement pays attention to the clarity and strictness of discussions on AI functions.
Competites for AGI development have been enhanced as many important players appear, including Openai, Anthropic, and the recent advanced Chinese model, Deepseek. “Currently, there are many competitors in the basic models … the actual race is for AGI. Can you reach the next level?” It suggests rapid progress and innovation to claim the title of a person.
Rust also reflects ethical responsibility involved in the evolution of AI. He states, “There are two big risks. One is a bad actor who reuses these general technology for harmful acts,” he said, and advanced technology for malicious purposes. Use it to emphasize the potential risk of bad actors. It has not yet been solved for dangerous technology, and the AI’s future is as complicated as exciting ones.
The debate applies to Hassabi’s views on the role of AI in various scientific fields. He emphasizes the extraordinary effects of AI to Life Science, and “AI is actually the correct analysis approach of such (complex) systems …” AI and health research intersections are multifaceted. We demonstrate innovative possibilities that can deal with issues. Disease treatment and sustainability of the environment.
Reflecting a wider social impact, Hassavis has expressed his awareness of rapid cultural changes brought by AI technology. “I think AI will be more involved. I think human ingenuity is still necessary to come up with theory …” This insight is the essence of his work. I am catching it. Rather than replacing human intelligence, a collaborator.
The way to realize a Hassabi vision will definitely have a strict talk about safety and ethics. He emphasized, “We should not (AI development). There are many economic reasons …” he emphasized.
According to the prediction of the AI project that leads the future Nobel Prize process, Hassabi assumes the next 10 years as full of discoveries driven by AI, and will be asked about the basic understanding of the scientific phenomena. I will put it on. His remarks provide both excitement and attention. Those who are carefully stepped in can greatly benefit from the AI tools, reminding them of delicate dances between innovation and ethical management.
