Federal Minister for Gilgit-Baltistan and Kashmir Affairs and Provinces and Frontier Territories Amir Muqam on Friday strongly criticized PTI founder Imran Khan, saying he is “prioritizing self-defense over the country’s interests”. and questioned his commitment to the nation’s well-being.
Since Imran was jailed in several cases last year, relations between the PTI and the government and ruling class have sharply deteriorated, with protests frequently escalating to violence amid a state crackdown.
After the unrest, Imran set up a five-member committee to consult with “anyone”, signaling a change in the stance of PTI members in parliament. In response, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif established a committee made up of members of the ruling coalition.
The first meeting between the two sides took place on December 23rd, and the second one yesterday (January 2nd). So far, the two sides have not made much progress as the PTI leadership has sought frequent talks with Imran to finalize the list of demands. The government and opposition are expected to meet again, likely next week.
In an exclusive interview with a private news channel, Muqam urged PTI to engage in dialogue with the government to address pressing economic issues and work towards the betterment of the country instead of “pursuing selfish politics”. urged.
PTI has been quite vocal about its main demands: a judicial commission to investigate the May 9 and November 26 riots and the release of political prisoners, including Imran.
In response to a question, Muqam clarified that the government’s negotiating committee had no authority to decide on Imran’s release.
He added that decisions will be taken by courts, and stressed the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring proper judicial process.
Mr. Muqam encouraged PTI to take legal action so that the court could decide Mr. Imran’s fate.
He also urged the PTI to seize the opportunity to hold a successful roundtable discussion, saying, “This approach is a mutually beneficial approach where both sides find common ground and work together to address pressing issues. It could only lead to negative results.”
