Supermodel Naomi Campbell is a centre of legal dispute after being banned from acting as a charitable trustee for fashion, Fashion for Relief, allegedly financial mismanagement surrounding her organization. I’m in.
As reported by the Guardian on February 5, 2025, Campbell launched an appeal against the verdict, claiming that a fake email account had impersonated her and misrepresented her involvement in mismanagement of funds. I’m doing it.
Founded by Campbell, Fashion For Relief aimed to raise funds for a variety of charity efforts through high-profile fashion events. One of the most notable glasses held at the British Museum in 2019 was attended by celebrities such as Naomie Harris, Pierce Brosnan, Skepta and Alexa Chong. The event was highly praised and the media describes it as a stunning display of philanthropy.
However, charities face growing concern over their financial practices. The report surfaced that partner charities, including Save the Children and The Mayor’s Fund for London, struggled to receive the promised donations. Some organizations even threatened to take legal action to recover the funds they believed they owed them.
Naomi Campbell challenges the findings of the Charity Committee amid allegations of fraud
The UK Charity Commission began an investigation into fashion relief in 2021, which ultimately led to the disbandment of the charity in March 2024. The committee report said the organization raised nearly £4.8 million between 2016 and 2020, but allocated only 8.5% of these funds. Grants to the causes of charitable .
Instead, a significant portion of the money was spent compiling luxurious fundraising events, as reported in the publication. Additionally, the report details cases of financial misconduct, including fraudulent payments, lack of receipts, and inadequate financial oversight. Naomi Campbell highlighted the personal expenses incurred, including staying at luxury hotels, spa treatments and personal security.
In response to these findings, Naomi Campbell and two other trustees, Bianca Helmitch and Veronica Chow, were banned from their roles as charity councillors. Hellmich was banned for nine years, Chou banned for four years, and Campbell was disqualified for five years.
After the Charitable Committee’s report was released in September 2024, Naomi Campbell challenged the findings, claiming that she was not involved in the daily fashion management of relief. She argues that fraudulent email accounts can impersonate her in critical communications with lawyers, leading to misrepresentation of her role within the organization.
The legal team at Naomi Campbell argues that evidence of this fake email account undermines the validity of the committee’s conclusions. As a result, Campbell was denied the opportunity to respond appropriately, claiming he was unaware of any important allegations during the investigation.
Campbell’s appeal will be reviewed at a court hearing scheduled for February 7, 2025. A court judge admits that the case contains serious claims and requires Campbell to prove his allegations of fraud against the former trustee. In a statement released Wednesday, Campbell reiterated her commitment to revealing the truth.
“Since the committee’s report, I have fought to reveal the facts. What has been unearthed so far is shocking. I fake my identity online and someone else has experienced me being there. I would like to shed some light on how easy it is to prevent it from doing. She said.
Naomi Campbell has long been associated with charity and has acquired the role of ambassador in organizations such as UNICEF and the Queen’s Federal Trust. However, the fashion controversy overshadowed her reputation for charity.
Edited by Meenakshi Ajith
