The annual Oscar race, about 10 months old, from the Cannes Film Festival in May to the Academy Awards ceremony in March, is like a political contest. The candidate starts with throwing a hat into the ring (film festival or first performance). Next, the candidate supporters (based on reactions and reviews) protect the pitch (emphasize the story that presents them with the highest light as possible), and voters (screenings and receptions. And ask for Q & A and interviews). Some are going to the preliminary election and the Cocas (many other awards ahead of Oscar). And the election day (Oscar Knight itself) will come.
But similarities do not end there. The meaning of winning a political election is more important and widespread than acquiring Oscar, but the potential rewards -reputation, financial, etc. -People, etc. -People are unpleasant. It causes acting and other people to search and expose past bad behavior.
Case -in point: Carla Sofia Gas Concon, a Spanish actress who played the title character in Emilia Perez and was rewarded by Oscar’s best nominated on January 23. Academy finalist.
In less than a week, the prospects of the gascon Oscar and the whole life have completely collapsed. In an interview on January 28, she suggested that her fellow actress Oscar candidate Fernanda Torres (I am still here) suggested that she was behind her attack. I did. The Brazilian army has been passionately defending Torres and her movie online.
Shortly thereafter, the tweet, which was posted by a gas conditioner over the past few years, contains a prejudiced commentary on a wide range of alienated communities and Oscar itself, excavated and distributed on X (previous Twitter). I was. Later, the whole became a viral, and the Gascon, which quickly disabled the X account, was changed to Hollywood Gary Condition, John Edwards, or George Santos, that is, completely toxic. At this point, Mel Gibson is probably more popular in the town.
You can guess that the exposure of the gascon tweet and its timing are not completely organic. In addition, Emilia Perez Distributor Netflix has a deep pocket and dozens of people specializing in the prize efforts, so at the center of the year before investing in the Oscar Campaign for the movie. You can claim that you should have caught. After all, the same situation contains only one tweet, but six years ago, another split movie GREEN BOOK was almost derailed.
But the bottom line is, of course, that the gas conditioner made it himself.
I think the whole situation is shocking and sad.
For the past few months, I have interacted quite a bit with a variety of festivals, events, interviews, and Q & AS, but no signs of this dark side could be seen. She had an undoubtedly special bond with the co -star Zoe Saldagna, Serena Gomez, and the director Jack audid. In many cases, she was accompanied by her young girl. She attacked me as a really impressive and wonderful child.
Beyond that, there is this. There is no need to like Emilia Perez in order to give a brave and bold performance in the movie and to recognize that the success of her awards represents the hope and progress of many others. Under various circumstances, she would have been celebrated in Oscar and continued to win or lose, and eventually, along with Sydney Poitier and Cassin Bigelow, the Academy Museum of the Academy Museum of Academy, which is explained as a pioneer. It would have been caught in the wall. 。
However, as a result of her actions, the possibility of actress Oscar, which was first mixed, has disappeared, and the same can be said about her future. And she again severely hurt her Oscar’s Oscar -this is definitely the forefront of Oscar’s best photographs, and she received 13 nominations leading the field. The prospects of her colleagues who were nominated for the movie. Given that Emilia Perez himself has become toxic based on my recent conversation with a member of the Academy, many people will have a hard time voting to Emilia Perez in every category.
Emilia Perez is far from the first Oscar Front Runner, who was caught in the “scandal” at the end of the prize season. Especially in the last quarter century or so, the naked naked knuckle shakespeare and a private Ryan brawl, the legitimacy of various degrees, and in some cases, the accusation of a faint origin threatening a beautiful prospects (a man is a man. It was said that Russell Crow was said to be an anti -Jew); Slumdog Millionaire (accused of exploiting an actor of Indian children); ); The king’s speech (is said to be forgered history); and a green book (for a very different thing).
Interestingly, all of these movies still have the best photo of Oscar. Academy members considered the claims that it could be false, misleading, or not important for the assessment of the quality of the movie. However, I feel that the gas conditioner is different from what came before. Do you feel offended? ) And it’s completely against what her and her movie is (that is, tolerance). In addition, she has undergone the efforts of many people who worked without knowing her fatigue on behalf of her.
This was a very modern Oscar scandal, not possible a few years before the appearance of the Internet and the rise of social media. Like politics, there are always the forms of opposition studies mobilized in Oscar racing, but usually depends on strategists who work on other campaigns. I don’t accept it, but it’s true. However, in this case, all signs are many people who oppose “attractive” at the end of the spectrum, or those who find the trance and the depiction of Emilia Perez in Mexico in Mexico. It is a sign of being a civilian. In aggressive, simply, the other took the problem, asked for damage to the person who was looking for, collected and found damage to the founder.
Is these civilians supporting and harming rival campaigns that benefit from the fall of Gascon and Emilia Perez? Anything is possible, and it is very difficult to prove it in the Internet and social media era. But the bottom line is still the same. They have completely improved the Oscar race.
