The final category of DeepSeek reserves the right to collect. Data from other sources. For example, creating a DeepSeek account using Google or Apple sign -on will receive some information from those companies. The advertiser also shares the information with DeepSeek, which includes “advertising mobile identifiers, email addresses, telephone numbers, and cookie IDs.
How DeepSeek uses information
A large amount of data may flow from Deepseek’s international user base to China, but the company still has the authority to use information. According to DeepSeek’s privacy policy, the company says that it will use data in many typical ways, such as maintaining the service, implementing and improving the terms of use.
Nevertheless, the company’s privacy policy suggests that it could use user prompts in the development of new models. The company states that “we will monitor and use the entire device, and to analyze how to use it, check, improve, and improve services, such as training and improvement of technology,” said the company.
DeepSeek’s privacy policy also states that the company uses information to “comply with legal obligations.” According to DeepSeek’s privacy policy, data can be accessed from a “corporate group” and share information with law enforcement agencies and civil servants.
All companies have legal obligations, but China -based companies have a remarkable responsibility. For the past decade, Chinese officials have passed a series of cyber security and privacy laws to enable state officials to request data from high -tech companies. For example, one of the 2017 law states that organizations and citizens need to “cooperate with national information initiatives.”
These laws have promoted the fear of security for Tactoku, as the trade tension between the United States and China has increased. The app was able to harvest a lot of data and send it back to China. People who are advantageous to prohibit Titock can also push Chinese propaganda using apps. (Tiktok has refused to send user data to the Chinese government.) On the other hand, some DeepSeek users have already pointed out that the platform has not provided any answers to the 1989 Tiananmon Square slaughter. I answer some questions in a way that sounds like a propaganda.
According to Willemsen, people who send messages to the generated AI system are more aggressive than users of social media platforms like Tiktok, and the content can be more personal. 。 In short, all impacts may increase. “The risk of changing subliminal content, the steering in the conversation direction, and the logic should lead to more concerns. Control, censorship rules, and intentions/personas are still non -cruting and childhood. Is already very popular.
King Scarage Rondon’s Orezinik states that Tactoku’s ban was a specific situation, but that US legal manufacturers or people in other countries could act on the same premise. “It is not possible to exclude the expansion of 2025. This is a direct action to AI companies,” says Orezinic. “Of course, data collection may have been named again as a reason.”
Updated 5:27 pm EST January 27, 2025: Added details on the DeepSeek website activity.