The revelations of MI5’s false testimony will undermine the credibility of other court cases where judges are obliged to give the evidence of security services enormous weight and respect.
These include secret hearings that are also closed to those most affected. Beth, including those whose relatives were killed in the attack, and those whose British citizenship was stripped from them.
MI5 said in a legal filing Wednesday that he is “acutely aware of the specific liability that MI5 will bear,” and that the court must be able to “relief fully in the evidence it provides.” Ta.
Security Services argues that NCND policies are essential to maintaining national security and keeping agents safe. However, the BBC revelation adds to concerns about how it is used, including that it could prevent agents from taking accountability when misusing their position or committing a crime.
The senior MI5 officer told me that the agent’s status was legally permitted to disclose, so that means he was signed off by MI5’s lawyers and other seniors. The Ministry of Home Affairs and the Cabinet Office should have also been notified in accordance with the policy of departure from the NCND.
After Wednesday’s hearing, a government spokesman said, “The minister and civil servants were not regularly consulted about private disclosures by the agency, and were not on this occasion.”
Meanwhile, in a written statement to the Congress, Secretary of the Interior Yvette Cooper said, “Providing false information to the courts is clearly a very serious issue,” but the government said, “Individually.” “We maintain and support the fact that an individual is or that an individual is so or that or denies.” It may not be operated on behalf of the UK Intelligence Reporting Agency.”
In a statement of new witnesses to the court, the deputy director of MI5 said that A had apologised for giving false evidence “heartbeat.”
He said the false information “reflects my honest beliefs at the time and accurately reflects the information I was given.”
