The email discussing the torrent proves that Meta knew it was “illegal,” the authors argued. And Bashlykov’s warning looked deaf. The authors claim that in April 2024, it indicates that Meta chose to hide the torrents instead, while downloading and seeding terabytes of terabytes from multiple Shadow libraries.
Meta is said to have hidden sowing
Perhaps Meta tried to hide the seed by not using a Facebook server while downloading a DataSet to avoid “risk” on Facebook servers. It describes the work as being in “stealth mode.” Meta also reportedly changed its settings “to ensure that as many seeding as possible occurs.” The META executive responsible for project management said in the deposit.
Now that new information is revealed, the author argues that the metastaff involved in the decision to torrent Livan must be rescinded, as new facts are said to be “contradictory to prior depository evidence.” It’s doing it.
For example, Mark Zuckerberg argued that he was not involved in the decision to train AI models using Libgen. However, the authors argued that the unedited message indicates that “the decision to use Liban occurs” after “a previous escalation to MZ.”
Meta did not respond immediately to ARS’ requests for comment and maintains it through the lawsuit that AI training on Libgen is “fair use.”
However, Meta is working on the torrent in a motion for rejection filed last month, saying, “The plaintiffs have told the court they are not suing a single case in which parts of the book were actually downloaded by a third party from Torrent. , far fewer plaintiffs’ books than they were distributed in some way by Meta.”
Meta may be confident in its legal strategy despite the wrinkles of the new torrent, but social media companies not only argue that the authors are illegally distributed, but also directly This appears to complicate the case by allowing the expansion of distribution theory, which is key to obtaining copyright infringement claims. Their work.
With limited discoveries on meta sowing, Meta is not currently fighting the sowing aspect of direct copyright infringement claims, and he says he will “set the record straight and debunk it.” .Summary judgment is planned for this unworthy allegation. ”
