Dear subscribers, I am thrilled by the response.
Your Turn is a unique section of ThePrint featuring perspectives from our subscribers. If you are a subscriber and have any feedback, please send it to us. If not, please subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
PAkistan’s political system is in crisis. Decades of dysfunctional institutions, systemic corruption, and the entrenchment of self-serving elites have pushed the country to the brink. This structural recession undermines public trust, impedes development, and perpetuates cycles of instability. Amid this turmoil, the rise of Imran Khan as a symbol of resistance offers a glimmer of hope, albeit amid controversy and polarization.
View full article
At the heart of Pakistan’s political dysfunction is a feudal and dynastic structure that prioritizes elite maintenance over public welfare. Political parties often function as family-run businesses, controlled by powerful clans whose primary interest is maintaining their grip on power rather than serving people’s needs.
Successive governments have been plagued by scandals involving the misappropriation of public funds. Institutions meant to protect accountability, such as the judiciary and anti-corruption agencies, are often compromised or weaponized against political opponents.
Inequalities are exacerbated by the state’s inability to provide basic services such as education, health care, and security. Meanwhile, the military’s widespread influence over civilian governance further weakens democratic institutions.
Pakistan is on the brink of economic collapse due to unsustainable borrowing, dependence on external aid, and lack of a coherent economic policy. This has disproportionately affected the poor, with inflation and unemployment reaching alarming levels.
The judiciary is often swayed by political pressure and military interests, and is unable to fulfill its role as an impartial arbiter. Its actions, from authorizing coups to approving questionable disqualifications, have contributed to the erosion of democracy.
In this difficult situation, Imran Khan has emerged as a disruptive force challenging the status quo. His rise was fueled by a populist discourse that resonated with masses disillusioned with traditional politics. His tenure as prime minister from 2018 to 2022 was marred by its own controversy, but his post-death resistance established him as a polarizing but transformative figure.
Mr. Khan’s comments against deep-rooted corruption resonated with the general public. His calls for greater transparency and accountability have created a new political debate centered on governance reform.
Mr. Khan’s popularity among Pakistan’s young people, who make up the majority of the population, is unprecedented. His ability to galvanize this demographic has injected new energy into Pakistan’s political landscape, sparking debate on issues such as education, employment and digital inclusion.
The long-term imprisonment of Imran Khan, Pakistan’s most prominent politician, has put a spotlight on the misuse of state institutions for political vendettas. The judicial maneuvers taken to secure his detention and its extension reveal deeper structural flaws in Pakistan’s political and judicial system and raise alarming questions about the erosion of democratic norms and the weaponization of the legal process. is causing problems.
Since being ousted in April 2022, Khan has faced an unprecedented legal onslaught, with more than 150 cases ranging from corruption to terrorism charges filed against him. Accountability is essential to any democratic system, but selectively targeting Mr. Khan and his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), serves to neutralize him politically. This is an organized effort.
The charges against him often lacked transparency, and his trial was held in opaque settings, including military courts. This approach undermines the rule of law and reinforces the perception that the judiciary and other state institutions are being used as instruments of political engineering.
Courts appear to be adopting a double standard, expediting cases against Khan while delaying or denying similar claims against political opponents. This selective application of justice diminished public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Mr. Khan has been arrested repeatedly, often under questionable circumstances and without following proper legal process. His re-arrest after being granted bail shows disregard for judicial orders and the rule of law.
Independent reporting on Mr. Khan’s detention is heavily censored, with media outlets forced to toe the regime line. This suppression of dissent undermines freedom of expression, a cornerstone of democracy.
Trying civilians, including Mr. Khan’s supporters, in military courts for political crimes would set a dangerous precedent. This signals a retreat from civilian oversight and undermines the principles of open justice.
Imran Khan’s continued imprisonment has significant political, social, and institutional implications. Khan’s imprisonment deepened divisions within Pakistan. His supporters see him as a victim of state repression, which could fuel resentment and lead to further unrest. Using state institutions to silence political opposition undermines Pakistan’s democratic framework and sets a troubling precedent for future governments. The judiciary, police, and responsible institutions lose legitimacy when they are seen as instruments of political persecution. Restoring public trust in these institutions will be an uphill battle.
Mr Khan’s resistance has become a rallying point for millions of people, and his plight highlights the broader struggle for justice and accountability in Pakistan. This struggle must go beyond individual leaders to build a system rooted in fairness and equality.
Mr. Khan’s resistance offers a glimmer of hope, but Pakistan’s political salvation requires institutional reform. The judiciary, election commission, and responsible institutions must operate independently and without bias. A clear separation of powers between civilian and military institutions is essential for a sustainable democracy. A focus on self-reliance, diversification and anti-poverty policies are essential for economic stability. Encouraging citizen participation and fostering a culture of political accountability can drive grassroots change.
Imran Khan’s journey symbolizes the aspirations of millions of Pakistanis for a fair and just system. For Pakistan to prosper, the resistance needs to evolve into a collective movement that prioritizes organizational change over political revenge.
The road to reform is difficult, but history shows that even the strongest institutions can crumble under the weight of deeply principled resistance. Pakistan is at a crossroads, and the choices its leaders and people make now will shape its destiny for generations to come.
These pieces are published as received and are not edited or fact-checked by ThePrint.
