Close Menu
Karachi Chronicle
  • Home
  • AI
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Israel has Iron Dome, Arrow, Tard and Russia, while the US has a Golden Dome… But what is the Indian plan? The Deputy Chief of the Army makes a big statement

Lockheed Martin loses bid for the sixth generation fighter jet, but forgets the F-35 Plus program

Louis Vuitton and Felix team from UNICEF’s Silver Rock Collection

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About us
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
Karachi Chronicle
  • Home
  • AI
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Karachi Chronicle
You are at:Home » Why is Elon Musk destabilizing UK and EU politics?
Politics

Why is Elon Musk destabilizing UK and EU politics?

Adnan MaharBy Adnan MaharJanuary 21, 2025No Comments7 Mins Read0 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email


Elon Musk’s recent interest in disrupting EU and UK politics may seem a bit mysterious. But as Damian Tambini argues, the reason behind this is the same reason Musk allied himself with Donald Trump: blatant economic rather than deep-seated ideological affinities. It’s profit.

Enjoying this post? Then sign up for our newsletter to receive a weekly roundup of all our articles.

Why on earth did British, German and European politics suddenly become so important to the world’s richest man? Elon may be obsessed with worries about immigration, “wokeness,” and the virtues of “Western civilization.” These topics have become increasingly prominent in his tweets. But personal economic interests explain why Mr Musk seems determined to weaken the EU and destabilize Germany in order to weaken the UK government.

In a move familiar to some newspaper historians, Elon Musk bought Twitter, a loss-making communications company, and turned it into a propaganda tool. He continued to trade the propaganda power of this new megaphone with political entrepreneurs, especially the president-elect, in exchange for returns on other investments. These investments in space, low-orbit satellites, and AI rely on state sponsorship and regulation, requiring closeness with political power, which is facilitated by propaganda power.

Considering that vicious cycle, it becomes clear why Elon Musk needs to disrupt the EU. If Foundation X is compromised, the entire House on the Sand can collapse. This is precisely the threat posed by the new paradigm of EU and UK regulation. Mr. Musk is doing everything he can to weaken EU regulations, and this is perhaps a sign that it is likely to be effective. Last Friday, the European Commission issued a retention order requiring X to preserve and share internal documents regarding its recommendation system and recent changes made to it. The European Commission is using its powers under the Digital Services Act to ensure that social media does not create systemic risks for Europe, including risks to democracy. Installing leaders in Europe who align with his and Trump’s worldview is fundamental to his business.

Installing leaders in Europe who align with his and Trump’s worldview is fundamental to his business.

This isn’t just about trying to destroy social media regulation. Mr. Musk has a valuable first-mover advantage in the satellite business, but if he secures that advantage and fails to strike a deal with a competitor, his business will become increasingly exposed to competition. Installing leaders in Europe who align with his and Trump’s worldview is fundamental to his business.

How new regulations threaten the X in masks

The US entrepreneur’s insane political intervention and his “heroic” stand on free speech seem more reasonable when we examine the current state of regulation in the EU and UK. Musk is waging an all-out campaign to undermine EU regulations by undermining the EU’s political balance and calling into question the very definition of free speech.

The uncomfortable fact is that cooperating with fact checkers (which Mr. Musk has refused to do and is now asking Meta to campaign against) is what platforms will have to do under the new EU regime. In 2023, the EU Parliament passed the Digital Services Act. Under the law, which is being phased in this year, search and social media providers will have a number of new obligations to clean up their platforms and mitigate harm. Across the EU, the largest platforms will be required to carry out detailed risk assessments. For example, we need to maintain effective complaint systems and work with third parties, such as well-known fact-checkers, to reduce not only harm to children, but also so-called “systemic harm.” ‘Risk’ also includes the risk of disinformation.

Elon Musk’s communications platform is currently strongly resisting regulation under the Digital Services Act and the UK’s Online Safety Act.

The UK, like many other countries outside the EU, has introduced a similar framework under its Online Safety Act. Part of the reason is that the prevailing approach to regulation is strongly influenced by the work of British regulation scholars such as Will Perrin and Lorna Woods.

Elon Musk’s communications platform is currently strongly resisting regulation under the Digital Services Act and the UK’s Online Safety Act. X has been required by the European Union to submit a risk assessment and has publicly criticized its legally mandated fact-checking and content moderation framework.

Mark Zuckerberg described the requirements of the Digital Services Act as a form of EU tariffs on US companies operating in the economy. EU policymakers will, of course, be unable to separate the economic aspects of this regulation from the geopolitical aspects. Ever since Edward Snowden exposed the various backdoors through which social media platform surveillance capitalism is integrated with the surveillance state, it has been rightfully rejected. Across the BRICS, particularly in Brazil and South Africa, the issue of regulating social media platforms is not only a matter of protecting citizens and children from harmful content, but also a matter of digital sovereignty.

One reason Mark Zuckerberg’s recent vehement stance against social media regulation was understandable is that it would immediately lead to significant cost savings.

How refusing regulation benefits Musk and Zuckerberg

It is difficult for Elon Musk to estimate the value of repealing the Digital Services Act and the UK Online Safety Act. It is important to understand not only the direct benefits to Musk, but also the indirect benefits. One reason Mark Zuckerberg’s recent rant against social media regulation was warranted is because it would immediately lead to significant cost savings. It’s not just internal content moderation, which is one of META’s most human-intensive tasks. But it also requires expensive contracts with third-party fact-checkers who seek to provide an “independent” opinion on the veracity of posts. This is the same as being told that Mazda no longer needs to install seat belts or airbags in its cars, nor does it need to meet smog safety standards. Liberalizing safety would immediately reduce costs for Facebook, just as it did for X. There is also some evidence that it leads to some users leaving the platform, but switching costs are high and as regulations ease, platform operators have more room to distribute things that are sticky and enticing. Masu. Content containing party propaganda.

But for people like Elon Musk, the indirect benefits of repealing laws that require platform operators to safely design their products are probably far more important. Mr. Musk has built his communications platform into a powerful and almost completely opaque propaganda platform that will soon be at the disposal of the American president. Complying with online safety laws will require Mr. Musk to blunt this propaganda tool and expose it to public scrutiny and accountability. By posing as a defender of free speech, he ended up currying favor with President Trump, who was about to go to jail on sedition charges, and gave him access to political power.

Mr. Musk and Mr. Zuckerberg define censorship purely in terms of state action, and not censorship by private actors (for example, Mr. Musk, who reportedly adjusts algorithms to increase the visibility of Mr. Musk’s own posts). It promotes a version of freedom of expression that is very tolerant of censorship (censorship by its own engineers). As I show in a recent book, this is an approach with deep historical roots in the United States, but such free speech philosophies are also being challenged in the United States. It is also in sharp conflict with the EU’s approach to free speech, which allows for various forms of speech regulation, independent of the state and subject to appropriate checks and balances.

Any legal challenge to the Digital Services Act is unlikely to succeed on free speech grounds, and as my recent research explores, any philosophy that tolerates more regulation of communications and media is unlikely to succeed. has deep historical and constitutional roots in European countries. . That is why, in Elon Musk’s view, the political solution that produced the result should be undone.

All articles posted on this blog give the views of the authors and do not represent the position of LSE British Politics and Policy or the London School of Economy and Political Science.

Image credit: Anna Moneymaker on Shutterstock

Did you like this post? Then sign up for our newsletter to receive a weekly roundup of all our articles.

Printable, PDF, and email compatible



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
Previous ArticleSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 5G is available on Amazon for Rs 67,486. Here’s how to get deals |
Next Article People Over Profit, Manufacturing News, ET Manufacturing
Adnan Mahar
  • Website

Adnan is a passionate doctor from Pakistan with a keen interest in exploring the world of politics, sports, and international affairs. As an avid reader and lifelong learner, he is deeply committed to sharing insights, perspectives, and thought-provoking ideas. His journey combines a love for knowledge with an analytical approach to current events, aiming to inspire meaningful conversations and broaden understanding across a wide range of topics.

Related Posts

“IAF lost fighter jets to pack due to political leadership constraints”: Indian defense attacher

June 29, 2025

The world should not ignore Pakistan’s terrorist trail to Pahargam from 9/11: Korea’s Abhishek Banerjee

May 26, 2025

Indian politics highlights | NDA has become synonymous with progress, welfare: Amit Shah

May 25, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

20 Most Anticipated Sex Movies of 2025

January 22, 2025144 Views

President Trump’s SEC nominee Paul Atkins marries multi-billion dollar roof fortune

December 14, 2024104 Views

Alice Munro’s Passive Voice | New Yorker

December 23, 202461 Views

How to tell the difference between fake and genuine Adidas Sambas

December 26, 202449 Views
Don't Miss
AI June 1, 2025

Dig into Google Deepmind CEO “Shout Out” Chip Engineers and Openai CEO Sam Altman, Sundar Pichai responds with emojis

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google Deepmind, has expanded public approval to its chip engineers, highlighting…

Google, Nvidia invests in AI startup Safe Superintelligence, co-founder of Openai Ilya Sutskever

This $30 billion AI startup can be very strange by a man who said that neural networks may already be aware of it

As Deepseek and ChatGpt Surge, is Delhi behind?

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

About Us
About Us

Welcome to Karachi Chronicle, your go-to source for the latest and most insightful updates across a range of topics that matter most in today’s fast-paced world. We are dedicated to delivering timely, accurate, and engaging content that covers a variety of subjects including Sports, Politics, World Affairs, Entertainment, and the ever-evolving field of Artificial Intelligence.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
Our Picks

Israel has Iron Dome, Arrow, Tard and Russia, while the US has a Golden Dome… But what is the Indian plan? The Deputy Chief of the Army makes a big statement

Lockheed Martin loses bid for the sixth generation fighter jet, but forgets the F-35 Plus program

Louis Vuitton and Felix team from UNICEF’s Silver Rock Collection

Most Popular

ATUA AI (TUA) develops cutting-edge AI infrastructure to optimize distributed operations

October 11, 20020 Views

10 things you should never say to an AI chatbot

November 10, 20040 Views

Character.AI faces lawsuit over child safety concerns

December 12, 20050 Views
© 2025 karachichronicle. Designed by karachichronicle.
  • Home
  • About us
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.